Gør som tusindvis af andre bogelskere
Tilmeld dig nyhedsbrevet og få gode tilbud og inspiration til din næste læsning.
Ved tilmelding accepterer du vores persondatapolitik.Du kan altid afmelde dig igen.
Is it possible for anarchism to think with the new ontologies and new materialisms, and is it possible to build a deeper anarchist philosophy which does not reduce the world to what it is for human animals within that world? Is it possible to think the question of a non-essentialist ontology? (Duane Rousselle and Jason Adams, "Anarchism's Other Scene")Radical theory has always been beset by the question of ontology, albeit to varying degrees and under differing conditions. In recent years, in particular, political metaphysics has returned with force: the rise of Deleuze-influenced "new materialisms," along with post-/non-Deleuzian Speculative Realism (SR) and Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO), all bear testament to this. In this same period, anarchism has returned as a major influence on social movements and critical scholarship alike. What, then, are some of the potential resonances between these currents, particularly given that anarchism has so often been understood/misunderstood as a fundamentally idealist philosophy? This special issue of ADCS, "Ontological Anarche: Beyond Materialism and Idealism," considers these questions in dialogue with the new materialisms, Speculative Realism, and Object-Oriented Ontology, in order to seek new points of departure.Ontological Anarche: Beyond Materialism and Idealism includes: EDITORS' INTRODUCTION: Duane Rousselle and Jason Adams, "Anarchism's Other Scene: Materializing the Ideal and Idealizing the Material"; ARTICLES: ONTOLOGICAL ANARCHE" Levi R. Bryant, "The Gravity of Things: An Introduction to Onto-Cartography" -- John W.M. Krummel, "Reiner Schurmann and Cornelius Castoriadis: Between Ontology and Praxis" -- Hilan Bensusan, "Polemos Doesn't Stop Anywhere Short of the World: On Anarcheology, Ontology, and Politics" -- Ben Woodard, "Schellingian Thought for Ecological Politics" -- Jason Harman, "Ontological Anarche: Beyond Arche & Anarche"; ARTICLES: ANARCHIST ONTOLOGY: Salvo Vaccaro, "Critique of Static Ontology and Becoming-Anarchy" -- Jared McGeough, "Three Scandals in the Philosophy of F.W.J. Schelling: Ontology, Freedom, Mythology" -- Joseph Christian Greer, "Occult Origins: Hakim Bey's Ontological Post-Anarchism" -- Tom Marling, "Anarchism and the Question of Practice: Ontology in the Chinese Anarchist Movement, 1919-1927" -- Gregory Kalyniuk,"Jurisprudence of the Damned: Deleuze's Masochian Humour and Anarchist Neo-Monadology"; REVIEW ESSAY: Shannon Brincat,"The Problem of an Anarchist Civil Society" -- Mohammed A. Bamyeh, "A Response to Shannon Brincat"; BOOK REVIEW: Anthony T. Fiscella, "Christian Anarchism"; INTERVIEW: Christos Stergiou interviews Levi Bryant.Anarchist Developments in Cultural Studies (ADCS), edited by Duane Rousselle and Sureyyya Evren, is an international, open-access journal devoted to the study of new and emerging perspectives in anarchist thought and practice from or through a cultural studies perspective. The interdisciplinary focus of the journal presumes an analysis of a broad range of cultural phenomena, the development of diverse methodological traditions, as well as the investigation of both macro-structural issues and the micrological practices of "everyday life." ADCS is an attempt to bring anarchist thought into contact with innumerable points of connection.
Negativity in Psychoanalysis examines the role of negativity in psychoanalytic theory and its application in clinical settings.While theories around negativity and death drive have become routinized within philosophical interpretations of Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis, they often mask an inherent positivity. This volume assembles highly esteemed psychoanalytic theorists and clinicians for an in-depth discussion on the topic. It features comprehensive introductions to Freudian and Lacanian perspectives, alongside contemporary clinical and cultural issues. The book also investigates how psychoanalytic negativity influences and is influenced by social, theological, and philosophical dialogues.This work will prove invaluable for practicing psychoanalysts and those in training, while also appealing to academics and scholars in critical and cultural theory, continental and post-continental philosophy, and sociology, especially those whose research intersects clinical and theoretical traditions.
What's left to say about the anarchist canon? One answer might be that reflecting on the canon's construction can help reveal something about the ways in which anarchism has been misunderstood. Another possibility is that it locates anarchism --- in all its diversity and complexity --- in particular geographical and historical locations. The canon not only establishes the parameters of anarchist theory, it sets them in a particular (European) context, serving as a springboard for subsequent revisions, developments and critiques. The canon describes a classic form, to use George Woodcock's term - it benchmarks anarchism. Who constructed it, where did it come from --- what are the implications of its reification in contemporary anarchist studies? How successful have recent critiques been in overcoming the limitations that canonical study has encouraged? What are the risks of leaving the canon intact, even if as a target for critique? Should anarchists worry about the explosion of the canon if the result is to include as 'anarchist' philosophers or movements who do identify with anarchist traditions? What does self-identification mean in the absence of a canon? Does the rejection of the canon imply the rejection of an anarchist history of ideas, and if such a history remains important in anarchism, how should it be approached and understood? In this special issue of Anarchist Developments in Cultural Studies (Issue 2013.1) edited by Ruth Kinna and Süreyyya Evren, noted anarchist scholars explore these questions.TABLE OF CONTENTS //EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION: Ruth Kinna and Süreyyya Evren, "Blasting the Canon"ARTICLES: Leonard A. Williams, "The Canon Which is Not One" --- James A. Miller, "Canon and Identity: Thoughts on the Hyphenated Anarchist" --- Matthew S. Adams, "The Possibilities of Anarchist History: Rethinking the Canon and Writing History" --- Michelle M. Campbell, "Voltairine de Cleyre and the Anarchist Canon" --- Nathan Jun, "Rethinking the Anarchist Canon: History, Philosophy, and Interpretation" --- Elmo Feiten, "Would the Real Max Stirner Please Stand Up?" --- Jim Donaghey, "Bakunin Brand Vodka: An Exploration into Anarchist-punk and Punk-anarchism" --- Ryan Knight, "Mikhail Bakunin's Post-Ideological Impulse: The Continuity Between Classical and New Anarchism"REVIEW/DEBATE: Robert Graham, "Black Flame A Commentary" --- Lucien van der Walt, "(Re)Constructing a Global Anarchist and Syndcalist Canon: A Response to Robert Graham and Nathan Jun on Black Flame"INTERVIEW: Gabriel Kuhn, "Interview with Jürgen Mümken"UNSCIENTIFIC SURVEY: "7 Sages of Anarchism"
In this Palgrave Pivot, Duane Rousselle aims to disrupt the hold that pragmatist ideology has had over American sociology by demonstrating that the social bond has always been founded upon a fundamental and primordial bankruptcy.
Tilmeld dig nyhedsbrevet og få gode tilbud og inspiration til din næste læsning.
Ved tilmelding accepterer du vores persondatapolitik.