Gør som tusindvis af andre bogelskere
Tilmeld dig nyhedsbrevet og få gode tilbud og inspiration til din næste læsning.
Ved tilmelding accepterer du vores persondatapolitik.Du kan altid afmelde dig igen.
AnyworkonthePlatonicconceptionofreasonhastowrestlewithafew signaldifficultiesoftheproblem.ThefirstisthatPlatohasnoexplicittheoryof 'reason'assuchinanyofhisworks.Thereis,forexample,nonotionof¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿in Plato:astrictlyandpreciselydefinedprincipleofcogitativepowerthatmakesa humanbeingtobewhatitessentiallyis.Initsplace,awideandvariedarrayof Greektermsisrenderedby'reason':¿¿¿¿,¿¿¿¿¿,¿¿¿¿¿¿,and¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿allshowup, atsomepointoranother,as'reason'intranslation.Ofalloftheseitisperhaps¿¿¿¿, sometimesalsotranslated'mind',thatcomesclosesttowhatweordinarily understandbytheterm.Thissimilarity,however,isdeceptive.Theproblemwith ¿¿¿¿isthatithasitsownregisterofmeaninginthecontextofAncientGreek philosophymoregenerally,throughtheinfluenceofAnaxagoras,forwhom¿¿¿¿ wasthe¿¿¿¿¿¿¿principleofbeing1.¿¿¿¿inthePhaedo(wherePlatoisexplicitly referringtoAnaxagoras)meanssomethingquitedifferentfrom¿¿¿¿inthePhaedrus (whereitisthefacultybywhichhumanbeingsapprehendthetruthintheirjourney aroundtheheavens),andbothoftheseinstancesofusagearequitedifferentfrom themodernideaof'reason'.Broadlyspeaking,however,wecansaythatthesetwo dialoguesuse'¿¿¿¿'accordingtotwodifferent,andopposite,acceptations: 'subjective'and'objective'¿¿¿¿
Tilmeld dig nyhedsbrevet og få gode tilbud og inspiration til din næste læsning.
Ved tilmelding accepterer du vores persondatapolitik.