Bøger udgivet af Liberty Bell Publications

What REALLY happened at the Nuremberg War Tribunals? This book contains shocking evidence that they were little more than lynch-mob proceedings, resulting in the Most Corrupt Trial of The Twentieth Century!It shows that the trials broke every legal precedent and procedure of evidence in the book. Evidence Was Tainted from The Beginning, The Verdicts Planned and Agreed Upon from The Outset. No Cross Examinations of Prosecution Witnesses, Their Presence in Court Not Even Required.Blatantly Fraudulent Documents Were Accepted as Fact Over and Over Again. Impossible Events Were Accepted Into 'Evidence' With No Scientific Proof of Opportunity for Rebuttal. Uninformed people consider the "Nuremberg War Crimes Trials" as the ultimate proof of the guilt of the German leadership before and during World War II. The transcripts of the proceedings, however, tell an entirely different story. What You Will Read In This Book Is So Astonishing that you may find yourself reaching the Same Conclusion As Have So Many Others When Shown The Truth....NOT guilty at Nuremberg...

Approximately 10,000 "War Crimes Trials" have been held since 1945. Trials of Japanese military personnel ended in 1949, yet "war crimes trials" of Germans and Eastern Europeans continue to date.Almost invariably, the charge is "violation of the laws and customs of war," derived, in turn, from international conventions signed at the Hague in 1899 and 1907.That these trials have little or no basis in law is clear from the wording of the treaties which are said to have been violated.The illegalities of "war crimes" proceedings include the admissi­bility of oral and written hearsay; the introduction of the concept of "conspiracy" into international law (unknown prior to 1945); the total lack of any pre-trial inquest or forensic evidence; and trial before a court itself composed of actual "war criminals."To quote the writings of Telford Taylor: "The issues surrounding the war crimes trials are numerous and complex; discussion and criticism of what was done should be welcomed by all who hope for a continuing development of inter­national law... but what should have been done instead is a problem generally ignored by those who condemn what was done in fact.99The alternative is a fair trial before an impartial court under existing procedures and proper rules of evidence.