Vi bøger
Levering: 1 - 2 hverdage

A Letter To The Rev. Mr. John Palmer, In Defense Of The Illustrations Of Philosophical Necessity (1779) - Joseph Priestley - Bog

Bag om A Letter To The Rev. Mr. John Palmer, In Defense Of The Illustrations Of Philosophical Necessity (1779)

""A Letter To The Rev. Mr. John Palmer, In Defense Of The Illustrations Of Philosophical Necessity"" is a book written by Joseph Priestley in 1779. The book is a defense of Priestley's views on philosophical necessity, which is the idea that all events and actions are determined by natural laws and causes. In the book, Priestley responds to criticisms made by John Palmer, a fellow theologian and philosopher, who had argued against Priestley's views on philosophical necessity. Priestley argues that Palmer's objections are based on misunderstandings of his position and that philosophical necessity is not incompatible with religious beliefs. The book is significant because it provides insight into the philosophical debates of the time and Priestley's views on the relationship between science and religion. It also highlights the importance of free inquiry and critical thinking in the pursuit of knowledge. Overall, ""A Letter To The Rev. Mr. John Palmer, In Defense Of The Illustrations Of Philosophical Necessity"" is a thought-provoking and informative book that is still relevant today in discussions about the nature of causality and determinism.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.

Vis mere
  • Sprog:
  • Engelsk
  • ISBN:
  • 9781164161325
  • Indbinding:
  • Paperback
  • Sideantal:
  • 162
  • Udgivet:
  • 10. September 2010
  • Størrelse:
  • 152x229x9 mm.
  • Vægt:
  • 227 g.
  • 2-3 uger.
  • 16. Oktober 2024
På lager

Normalpris

Medlemspris

Prøv i 30 dage for 45 kr.
Herefter fra 79 kr./md. Ingen binding.

Beskrivelse af A Letter To The Rev. Mr. John Palmer, In Defense Of The Illustrations Of Philosophical Necessity (1779)

""A Letter To The Rev. Mr. John Palmer, In Defense Of The Illustrations Of Philosophical Necessity"" is a book written by Joseph Priestley in 1779. The book is a defense of Priestley's views on philosophical necessity, which is the idea that all events and actions are determined by natural laws and causes. In the book, Priestley responds to criticisms made by John Palmer, a fellow theologian and philosopher, who had argued against Priestley's views on philosophical necessity. Priestley argues that Palmer's objections are based on misunderstandings of his position and that philosophical necessity is not incompatible with religious beliefs. The book is significant because it provides insight into the philosophical debates of the time and Priestley's views on the relationship between science and religion. It also highlights the importance of free inquiry and critical thinking in the pursuit of knowledge. Overall, ""A Letter To The Rev. Mr. John Palmer, In Defense Of The Illustrations Of Philosophical Necessity"" is a thought-provoking and informative book that is still relevant today in discussions about the nature of causality and determinism.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.

Brugerbedømmelser af A Letter To The Rev. Mr. John Palmer, In Defense Of The Illustrations Of Philosophical Necessity (1779)



Gør som tusindvis af andre bogelskere

Tilmeld dig nyhedsbrevet og få gode tilbud og inspiration til din næste læsning.