Bøger i Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions serien

Corporate law has traditionally assumed that men organize business, men profit from it, and men bring cases in front of male judges when disputes arise. It overlooks or forgets that women are dealmakers, shareholders, stakeholders, and businesspeople too. This lack of inclusivity in corporate law has profound effects on all of society, not only on women's lives and livelihoods. This volume takes up the challenge to imagine how corporate law might look if we valued not only women and other marginalized groups, but also a feminist perspective emphasizing the importance of power dynamics, equity, community, and diversity in corporate law. Prominent lawyers and legal scholars rewrite foundational corporate law cases, and also provide accompanying commentary that situates each opinion in context, explains the feminist theories applied, and explores the impact the rewritten opinion might have had on the development of corporate law, business, and society.

Corporate law has traditionally assumed that men organize business, men profit from it, and men bring cases in front of male judges when disputes arise. It overlooks or forgets that women are dealmakers, shareholders, stakeholders, and businesspeople too. This lack of inclusivity in corporate law has profound effects on all of society, not only on women's lives and livelihoods. This volume takes up the challenge to imagine how corporate law might look if we valued not only women and other marginalized groups, but also a feminist perspective emphasizing the importance of power dynamics, equity, community, and diversity in corporate law. Prominent lawyers and legal scholars rewrite foundational corporate law cases, and also provide accompanying commentary that situates each opinion in context, explains the feminist theories applied, and explores the impact the rewritten opinion might have had on the development of corporate law, business, and society.

Reimagining fundamental property cases from a feminist perspective, this volume illustrates ways in which property law has served to suppress women and other marginalized groups. The book is for scholars and students interested in property law, zoning and land use, landlord-tenant law, gender and the law, and intellectual property.

Reimagining fundamental property cases from a feminist perspective, this volume illustrates ways in which property law has served to suppress women and other marginalized groups. The book is for scholars and students interested in property law, zoning and land use, landlord-tenant law, gender and the law, and intellectual property.

This volume of rewritten torts opinions exposes how courts often distort conventional legal doctrine when deciding cases involving gender-related harms. It will make students, lawyers, and judges who build arguments and apply tort doctrine more aware of inequalities of race, gender, class, sexual orientation and identity.

This book is for scholars and students interested in employment law and feminism. It will provide readers with a new way to think about the law of employment discrimination, and how feminist perspectives might lead to a reimagined workplace that is more welcoming and prosperous for marginalized workers.

This book is for scholars and students interested in employment law and feminism. It will provide readers with a new way to think about the law of employment discrimination, and how feminist perspectives might lead to a reimagined workplace that is more welcoming and prosperous for marginalized workers.

This book analyzes estates and trusts cases through a feminist lens to demonstrate how the law has limited the property rights of women and other marginalized groups. This book will be useful to law students learning to read cases and to anyone else interested in understanding ways in which the law has been applied inequitably.

This volume of rewritten torts opinions exposes how courts often distort conventional legal doctrine when deciding cases involving gender-related harms. It will make students, lawyers, and judges who build arguments and apply tort doctrine more aware of inequalities of race, gender, class, sexual orientation and identity.

This book analyzes estates and trusts cases through a feminist lens to demonstrate how the law has limited the property rights of women and other marginalized groups. This book will be useful to law students learning to read cases and to anyone else interested in understanding ways in which the law has been applied inequitably.

Reproductive justice (RJ) is a pivotal movement that supplants the limitations of reproductive rights. This book re-imagines cases about critical RJ issues like forced sterilization, welfare caps, and abortion funding to highlight the law's impact on vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities, poor women, and women of color.

Reproductive justice (RJ) is a pivotal movement that supplants the limitations of reproductive rights. This book re-imagines cases about critical RJ issues like forced sterilization, welfare caps, and abortion funding to highlight the law's impact on vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities, poor women, and women of color.

Law school professors and students will use this book to supplement courses in family law and feminist legal theory. Diverse scholars and researchers - interested in the intersections of family law and disciplines such as asylum law, civil procedure, surrogacy, trans identity, and others - will read this book.

Law school professors and students will use this book to supplement courses in family law and feminist legal theory. Diverse scholars and researchers - interested in the intersections of family law and disciplines such as asylum law, civil procedure, surrogacy, trans identity, and others - will read this book.

Through re-imagined judicial opinions, this volume shows the difference feminist theory and methods can make in tax law. The opinions and accompanying commentary demonstrate that anyone who cares about justice should care about greater diversity in the judiciary.

Through re-imagined judicial opinions, this volume shows the difference feminist theory and methods can make in tax law. The opinions and accompanying commentary demonstrate that anyone who cares about justice should care about greater diversity in the judiciary.

The book offers twenty-five rewritten Supreme Court opinions and commentaries that demonstrate that anyone who cares about equality should care about greater diversity in the judiciary. This significant work by leading feminist legal scholars will be welcomed by all interested in how gender issues are addressed in the American legal system.

The book offers twenty-five rewritten Supreme Court opinions and commentaries that demonstrate that anyone who cares about equality should care about greater diversity in the judiciary. This significant work by leading feminist legal scholars will be welcomed by all interested in how gender issues are addressed in the American legal system.