Bøger af Isaac Mhute

This two-volume set charts a cross-disciplinary discursive terrain that proffers rich insights about deceit in contemporary postcolonial Sub-Saharan African politics. In an attempt to produce a nuanced and multifaceted academic dialoguing platform, the two volumes have a particular focus on the aspects of treachery, fear of difference (oppositional politics), and discourses/semiotics of mis/self-representation. The major aim of the proposed volumes is to contribute toward the often problematised conversations about the unfolding (post)colonial Sub-Saharan world which is topical in decolonial and Pan-African studies.The volumes seek to place political thinking and postcolonial political systems under the scholarly gaze with the view to highlight and enhance the participation of African cross-disciplinary scholarship in the postcolonial political processes of the continent. Most significantly, it is through such probing of the limitations of our own disciplinary perspectives which can help us appreciate the complexity of the postcolonial Sub-Saharan African politics. The first volume uses Zimbabwe as a case study, while the second volume examines postcolonial politics in Sub-Saharan Africa more broadly.The first volume uses Zimbabwe as a case study, while the second volume examines postcolonial politics in Sub-Saharan Africa more broadly.The first volume uses Zimbabwe as a case study, while the second volume examines postcolonial politics in Sub-Saharan Africa more broadly.

This study delves into the syntactic notion of subject relation in Karanga with the aim of characterizing and defining it. Data was collected through recording oral interviews as well as doing selective listening to speeches at various levels. The research found out that there is no one single rule that can be used to determine the subject of every possible Karanga sentence. One has to make use of all the seven selectional principles established in the well researched natural languages. It also came to light that the Karanga subject relation has a number of subcategories as a result of the various selectional rules involved in determining them. These were also ranked in a hierarchy of importance in the language. For instance, some can be shifted easily from their original host words and, whilst some are assigned to the words at the deep structure or underlying level of syntax, some are assigned at the surface structure level. It, therefore, emerged that the freedom of the subject relation in the language varies with the subcategory of relation.