Gør som tusindvis af andre bogelskere
Tilmeld dig nyhedsbrevet og få gode tilbud og inspiration til din næste læsning.
Ved tilmelding accepterer du vores persondatapolitik.Du kan altid afmelde dig igen.
My dissertation defends a modern version of Role Ethics modeled on thefunctioning of human moral psychology, and proposes a novel method for identifying theinstitutional roles of a well-ordered collective. In particular, I defend the view that ourduties are determined by the social roles we incur in the communities we inhabit. Thecompanion project extends Role Ethics into the political domain. I argue that we canidentify the well-ordered collective in roughly the same way we identify the goodindividual, by discerning the dispositions in the relevant agent that are conducive to itswell-being. By scaling up, we shift attention from the moral dispositions of individualsto the moral dispositions of collectives - the institutions that determine the moralcharacter of a population. While philosophers have tended to focus on the formalinstitutions of the state, this research is largely concerned with the 'informal institutions'of a collective, the implicit social roles/practices constructed and enforced endogenously,such as those involved in structuring human friendships. What I call 'CollectiveEudaimonism' is a kind of virtue ethics writ large, a normative theory taskedwith identifying correlations between a set of informal institutions and theindicators of flourishing human collectives.
Tilmeld dig nyhedsbrevet og få gode tilbud og inspiration til din næste læsning.
Ved tilmelding accepterer du vores persondatapolitik.