International ret

The book provides a comprehensive legal assessment of four different types of safe pathways to protection in the EU: the asylum visa, resettlement, ad hoc humanitarian admission and sponsorship programs. It investigates the effects these pathways can have on the asylum paradox, that is the paradoxical interplay in current EU asylum policy between the granting of territorial protection on the one hand and the prevention of access to territory on the other.Based on the assumption, that the asylum paradox is the result of a conflict of responsibility principles, the book develops an analytical tool, a responsibility framework, for the analysis and assessment. Overall, the book identifies normative differences, depending on the specific pathway and its details of implementation.

These are the WTO's authorized and paginated reports in English. They are an essential addition to the library of all practising trade lawyers and a useful tool for students and academics worldwide working in the field of international economic or trade law. The form of citation for this volume recommended by the WTO is DSR 2019: I-III.

These are the WTO's authorized and paginated reports in English. They are an essential addition to the library of all practising trade lawyers and a useful tool for students and academics worldwide working in the field of international economic or trade law. The form of citation for this volume recommended by the WTO is DSR 2019: I-III.

These are the WTO's authorized and paginated reports in English. They are an essential addition to the library of all practising trade lawyers and a useful tool for students and academics worldwide working in the field of international economic or trade law. The form of citation for this volume recommended by the WTO is DSR 2019: I-III.

"This book addresses the international legal issues surrounding the adoption of secondary sanctions. These controversial measures aim to regulate economic or financial transactions between third states and a target state. The volume takes on board recent evolutions in case-law and practice, such as the drafting of the EU Anti-Coercion Instrument"--

This book navigates a way through various jurisdictional matters to which practitioners should have regard when tendering advice to family law clients. Even where a case initially appears to be straightforward, it is imperative (from a risk management perspective) to ensure that comprehensive advice has been provided.For families, increased global mobility has potential significant consequences. This practical guide distils the key issues into accessible sections, focussing on jurisdiction, enforcement, arbitration, protective agreements and the movement of children. This is a useful reference guide for those involved in advising clients on a daily basis, for the preparation of legal submissions, for students or simply those with an interest in this fascinating area of law.CONTENTSChapter One - Relationships Entered Into AbroadChapter Two - Jurisdiction on Separation: ScotlandChapter Three - Jurisdiction on Separation: UK and the Channel IslandsChapter Four - Raising an Action in Scotland: Which Court?Chapter Five - BrexitChapter Six - Contest of JurisdictionChapter Seven - Protection: Pre and Post Nuptials and Other Forms of AgreementChapter Eight - ArbitrationChapter Nine - EnforcementChapter Ten - Parental Rights and ResponsibilitiesChapter Eleven - The Hague ConventionChapter Twelve - Relocating With Children: "Shared Parental Intention"Chapter Thirteen - The Welfare PrincipleChapter Fourteen - Views of ChildrenChapter Fifteen - Other Considerations for the Court in Child Relocation CasesChapter Sixteen - Relocating From Scotland to Other CountriesChapter Seventeen - Preparing Your Client's Child Relocation CaseChapter Eighteen - Cases of InterestChapter Nineteen - International Child Abduction After BrexitChapter Twenty - Habitual ResidenceChapter Twenty-One - Conclusion

إم إس شوز سلسلة خريف كتاب اثنين - تأمين العرض العام كان سخيفا هي قصة شركة لتدمير شركة قادمة ورجل أعمال. لقد رفض المكتتبون المطالبة وطعنوا فيها حتى عام 2022 ستظل المحكمة العليا في دلهي تصدر المراسيم . بما في ذلك ، كان الاكتتاب العام هو التأمين ، الذي فشل ورفض الدفع لأسباب واهية. ومع ذلك ، بعد عشر سنوات من التقاضي المضني ، عينت المحكمة العليا في دلهي محكمًا. تم تمرير الجائزة بعد خمس سنوات أقل من قانون التحكيم ، 1940 ، لصالح شركة إم إس شوز لمنح التعويضات.على الجانب الآخر ، استخدمت شركة جي أ بي إل و ك مادهافان ، المدير المشترك المتقاعد لمكتب التحقيقات المركزي ، منصبه السابق أمام السلطات الحكومية للتشهير العلني بسمعة إم إس شوز بافان ساتشديفا. لذا ، فإن سقوط شركة إم إس شوز ليس مكتوبًا في تاريخ الشركة. لا يزال ، غير معروف للجمهور. يكشف فيلم " تأمين العرض العام كان سخيفا " حقيقة أن بعض الأفراد يمكن أن يصعدوا للعب أقذر لعبة ، ويرفض الضامنون الدفع. تأمين العرض العام كان سخيفا. إم إس شوز سلسلة خريف هي قصة الشركة الحقيقية.

ام اس شوس سری سقوط کتاب دو - بیمه پیشنهاد عمومی پوچ بود یک داستان شرکتی از نابودی یک شرکت و یک کارآفرین آینده است. پذیره نویسان تا سال 2022 این ادعا را رد کرده و آن را به چالش کشیده اند دادگاه عالی دهلی همچنان این احکام را تصویب خواهد کرد . از جمله، موضوع عمومی پذیره نویسی بیمه بود که شکست خورد و به دلایل ضعیف از پرداخت آن خودداری کرد. با این حال، پس از ده سال دعوای شدید، دادگاه عالی دهلی داور را منصوب کرد. این جایزه پس از پنج سال از دست دادن به تصویب رسید قانون داوری ، 1940، به نفع ام اس شوس که خسارت را اعطا کرد.از طرف دیگر، شرکت گجرات آپار پلیمر محدود و ک مدهوان ، مدیر مشترک بازنشسته اداره مرکزی تحقیقات، از موقعیت قبلی خود قبل از اینکه مقامات دولتی آشکارا ام اس شوس پون ساچدوا را بدنام کنند، استفاده کردند. بنابراین، سقوط شرکتی ام اس شوس در تاریخ شرکت ثبت نشده است. هنوز برای مردم ناشناخته است. " بیمه پیشنهاد عمومی پوچ بود " این واقعیت را آشکار می کند که برخی از افراد می توانند برای بازی کثیف ترین بازی بروند و پذیره نویسان از پرداخت خودداری می کنند. بیمه پیشنهاد عمومی پوچ بود. ام اس شوس سری سقوط داستان واقعی واقعی شرکت است.

This book analyses how China has engaged in global IP governance and the implications of its engagement for global distributive justice. It investigates five cases on Chinäs IP engagement in geographical indications, the disclosure obligation, IP and standardisation, and its bilateral and multilateral IP engagement. It takes a regulation-oriented approach to examine substate and non-state actors involved in Chinäs global IP engagement, identifies principles that have guided or constrained its engagement, and discusses strategies actors have used in managing the principles. Its focus on engagement directs attention to processes instead of outcomes, which enables a more nuanced understanding of the role that China plays in global IP governance than the dichotomic categorisation of China either as a global IP rule-taker or rule-maker.This book identifies two groups of strategies that China has used in its global IP engagement: forum and agenda-related strategies and principle-related strategies. The first group concerns questions of where and how China has advanced its IP agenda, including multi-forum engagement, dissembling, and more cohesive responsive engagement. The second group consists of strategies to achieve a certain principle or manage contesting principles, including modelling and balancing. It shows that Chinäs deployment of engagement strategies makes its IP system similar to those of the EU and the US. Its balancing strategy has led to constructed inconsistency of its IP positions across forums. This book argues that China still has some way to go to influence global IP agenda-setting in a way matching its status as the second largest economy.

MS SHOES ดร็อปซีรีส์ หนังสือ II - การทำประกันข้อเสนอสาธารณะนั้นไร้สาระ เป็นเรื่องราวขององค์กรที่ทำลายบริษัทที่กำลังจะเกิดขึ้นและผู้ประกอบการ ผู้จัดการการจัดจำหน่ายได้ปฏิเสธการอ้างสิทธิ์และโต้แย้งจนถึงปี 2565 ศาลสูงแห่งเดลีจะยังคงผ่านกฤษฎีกา . รวมถึงปัญหาสาธารณะในการรับประกันภัยคือการประกันภัยซึ่งล้มเหลวและปฏิเสธที่จะจ่ายเงินภายใต้เงื่อนไขที่บอบบาง อย่างไรก็ตาม หลังจากสิบปีของการฟ้องร้องที่หนักหน่วง ศาลสูงแห่งเดลีได้แต่งตั้งอนุญาโตตุลาการ รางวัลนี้ผ่านไปแล้วหลังจากผ่านไปห้าปี พระราชบัญญัติอนุญาโตตุลาการ พ.ศ. 2483 เห็นชอบให้ MS Shoes ชดใช้ค่าเสียหายในอีกด้านหนึ่ง บริษัท Gujarat Apar Polymers Limited (GAPL) และ K. Madhavan ผู้อำนวยการร่วมของสำนักงานสอบสวนกลางที่เกษียณแล้ว ใช้ตำแหน่งเดิมของเขาก่อนที่เจ้าหน้าที่ของรัฐจะกล่าวร้าย MS Shoes กับ Pavan Sachdeva อย่างเปิดเผย ดังนั้น การล่มสลายของบริษัทของ MS Shoes จึงไม่ได้ถูกบันทึกไว้ในประวัติของบริษัท ยังไม่เป็นที่รู้จักต่อสาธารณชน "การทำประกันข้อเสนอสาธารณะนั้นไร้สาระ" ตีแผ่ความจริงที่บุคคลบางคนสามารถขึ้นไปเล่นเกมที่สกปรกที่สุดได้ และ ผู้รับประกันภัย ปฏิเสธที่จะจ่ายเงิน การทำประกันข้อเสนอสาธารณะนั้นไร้สาระ MS SHOES ดร็อปซีรีส์ คือเรื่องราวขององค์กรอย่างแท้จริง

MS Shoes 没落 シリーズ ブック二 - 公募の保証はばかげていた』は、新進気鋭の企業と起業家を破滅させる企業物語である。アンダーライターは2022年まで請求を拒否し、争ってきた。デリー高等法院はそれでも判決を下すだろう。それを含めて、引受公社は保険に失敗し、薄弱な理由で支払いを拒否した。しかし、10年にわたる激しい訴訟の末、デリー高等裁判所は仲裁人を任命した。1940年の仲裁法に基づき、5年の歳月を経て、MS Shoes 社に損害賠償を認める裁定が下された。もう一方では、グジャラート・アパール・ポリマーズ社（GAPL）と、中央捜査局を退職したK.マダヴァンが、MS Shoes のパヴァン・サクデーヴァを公然と中傷した。そのため、MS Shoes の没落は企業史に記されていない。しかし、世間にはまだ知られていない。「引受公募債（公募の保証はばかげていた）」は、一部の個人が最も汚いゲームに興じることができ、引受人は支払いを拒否するという現実を暴露している。公募の保証はばかげていた。MS Shoes 没落 シリーズ は、真の企業物語である。

MS SHOES ОСЕННЯЯ СЕРИЯ КНИГА II - СТРАХОВАНИЕ ПУБЛИЧНОЙ ОФЕРТЫ БЫЛО АБСУРДНЫМ Страховщики отказывались от иска и оспаривали его до 2022 года. Решения Высокого суда Дели будут приниматься и сейчас. В том числе, андеррайтинг публичным вопросом было страхование, которое не удалось и отказалось платить по надуманным основаниям. Однако после десяти лет напряженных судебных разбирательств Высокий суд Дели назначил арбитра. Арбитражное решение было принято через пять лет в соответствии с Законом об арбитраже 1940 года в пользу компании MS Shoes. С другой стороны, компания Gujarat Apar Polymers Limited (GAPL) и К. Мадхаван, бывший содиректор Центрального бюро расследований, использовали свое предыдущее положение перед правительственными властями, открыто дискредитировав Павана Сачдеву. Таким образом, корпоративное падение MS Shoes не вписывается в историю компании. Тем не менее, неизвестен общественности. СТРАХОВАНИЕ ПУБЛИЧНОЙ ОФЕРТЫ БЫЛО АБСУРДНЫМ " раскрывает реальность того, что некоторые люди могут подняться, чтобы сыграть в самую грязную игру, а андеррайтеры отказываются платить. Страхование публичной оферты было абсурдным. MS SHOES ОСЕННЯЯ СЕРИЯ - это настоящая корпоративная история.

MS SHOES낙하 시리즈 책 II - 공개 제안이 터무니없는 보장 는 다가오는 회사와 기업가를 파괴하는 기업 이야기입니다.보험업자들은 2022년까지 청구를 거부하고 이의를 제기해 왔습니다.델리 고등 법원은 여전히 법령을 통과시킬 것입니다.예를 들어, 인수 공적 문제는 보험이었는데, 보험은 어설픈 이유로 지불을 거부하고 실패했습니다.그러나 10 년간의 격렬한 소송 끝에 델리 고등 법원은 중재자를 임명했습니다.이 판정은 1940년 중재법에 따라 5년 만에 통과되었으며 MS Shoes가 손해 배상을 승인했습니다.한편, 구자라트 아파르 폴리머스 리미티드 (GAPL) 와 은퇴한 중앙수사국 공동 책임자인 K. 마드하반은 정부 당국이 MS Shoes 파반 사치데바 의 명예를 공개적으로 훼손하기 전에 직위를 이용했다.따라서 MS Shoes의 기업 몰락은 기업 역사에 기록되지 않습니다.그래도 대중에게 알려지지 않았습니다." 공개 제안이 터무니없는 보장"는 일부 개인은 가장 더러운 게임을 플레이하기 위해 올라갈 수 있지만 보험업자는 지불을 거부한다는 현실을 폭로합니다. 공개 제안이 터무니없는 보장. MS SHOES낙하 시리즈 진정한 기업 이야기입니다.

The starting point of this book is the generally shared observation that in violence-torn areas of limited statehood, the civilian population is often subject to deliberate attacks. This violence often escalates to core crimes such as war crimes, crimes against humanity and even genocide. The International Criminal Court (ICC) could potentially deter such crimes. In order to do so, it largely depends on the cooperation of the states on the territory of which alleged core criminals operate. Since such states are often unwilling or unable to cooperate, the book explores whether the ICC could instead seek assistance from international forces such as UN peace support operations, UN-mandated missions, and belligerent occupants.The book covers, on the one hand, the law and practice of the UN Security Council with regard to mandating international forces to arrest and transfer alleged offenders to the ICC or to other international courts. On the other, it addresses to what extent international forces may or must hand alleged offenders over to the ICC, regardless of such mandates. More precisely, the book examines whether the duties to prosecute genocide, torture, enforced disappearance, grave breaches and other war crimes apply extraterritorially and ¿ if so ¿ whether international forces can discharge these duties by transferring suspects to the ICC.At the same time, the book addresses the limitations to such extraterritorial action: firstly, to what extent the prohibition of the use of force and the principle of territorial sovereignty restrict extraterritorial deprivations of liberty and transfer to the ICC. Secondly, it explores the restrictions and permissions that the law of occupation and other norms of international humanitarian law impose on such apprehensions and transfers. Finally, it discusses how international forces can uphold the right to liberty and security as well as the principle of non-refoulementwhen they extraterritorially apprehend ICC suspects. This also reflects the book¿s relevance with regard to the more general debate on the extraterritorial application of human rights.

This book focuses on OLAF, the European Union¿s anti-fraud office, and examines the role of and challenges concerning fundamental rights in OLAF¿s composite enforcement procedure. The mission of OLAF (Office Européen de Lutte Antifraude) is to fight fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities that affect the financial interests of the European Union. To this end, OLAF carries out administrative investigations, in which it gathers evidence itself, and coordination cases, in which it coordinates the Member States¿ investigations. OLAF¿s investigation and coordination efforts are conceived of as mere derivatives of other more traditional forms of law enforcement cooperation in which authorities enter into obligations to cooperate with one another, but in which each acts to fulfill these obligations within its own separately identifiable legal order and on the basis of its own law. This system, in its most conventional form, is founded on the notion of territorial sovereignty.If we extend the logic of this approach from enforcement (the ¿sword¿) to fundamental rights (the ¿shield¿), issues in relation to the latter ¿ and the accompanying responsibility to prevent and/or remedy them ¿ can arise only in individual (sovereign) legal orders. The way in which we view OLAF, as an evolved cognate of traditional forms of law enforcement cooperation, therefore directly dictates which fundamental rights issues enter into the equation, and in which manner.This book proposes an innovative way of looking at OLAF, which we refer to as ¿composite enforcement procedures.¿ In this type of procedure, responsibilities for the entirety of enforcement are attributed to inextricably interlinked European Union and Member State legal orders. If we observe OLAF through this new lens, fundamental rights issues that would otherwise go unnoticed come to the forefront. These are issues that arise not in individual legal orders, but rather between or among theEuropean Union and the Member States. This book addresses these fundamental rights challenges and makes concrete recommendations on how they can be addressed and resolved.

This book showcases Nigerian and South African experiences on space politics, policy and strategy vis-à-vis their development and security aspirations, while contributing to the broader African and the Global-South perspectives on the subject. Space policy in developing countries such as Nigeria and South Africa is motivated by utilitarian promises that space and the attendant technologies have the potential to advance development and security interests of the affected nations. However, several decades into the orbital journey of these countries, little is known of their space politics, policies, strategies, capacities and capabilities, and realisation of desired objectives. Beyond pure and applied sciences reductionism, this book offers social science perspectives on space studies in Africa, as it examines the intricate relationships of historical, geographical, social, demographic, economic, political, administrative, and strategic factors, nationally, regionally and globally thathave shaped research and development of space science and technologies, and their benefits, in Nigeria and South Africa.

This book assesses the EU legal framework applicable to dairy products obtained through precision fermentation. It maps the authorisation and labelling requirements for these products to be placed on the EU market. It compares these provisions to those governing the food markets in the USA and Singapore, which are considered to be more innovation-friendly. At the time of writing, the precision-fermented dairy sector is still in the developmental phase, with only a few precision-fermented dairy alternatives available on the market, none of which are present in the EU. Regulatory uncertainty has been cited as significant obstacle for food business operators seeking to introduce alternative protein products in the EU. The book confirms these reports, as the current EU regulatory framework presents several legal uncertainties that are challenging for food business operators to overcome. Broadly speaking, there are two authorisation frameworks applicable to dairy products obtained through precision fermentation in the EU. The choice between these frameworks depends on the presence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or residues thereof in the final product. If such GMOs or residues are present, the pre-market authorisation procedure is governed by the Genetically Modified Food and Feed Regulation (GMFR). If the final product does not contain any GMOs or residues, it falls under the scope of the Novel Food Regulation (NFR), and the pre-market authorisation procedure is governed accordingly. Both of these authorisation pathways entail high regulatory requirements, which can pose challenges for the development of the precision fermentation sector. Despite the difficulty in accurately classifying products, it is crucial for food business operators to comprehend the applicable legal framework early in the product development process, given that the authorisation paths differ in their standards. In addition to pre-market authorisation requirements, companies must address labelling issues. Food labelling shall provide a basis for consumers to make informed choices in relation to the foods they consume. The primary objective of EU food labelling law is to prevent consumer deception , making it crucial for dairy products and their animal-free alternatives, to adhere to a stringent naming law as stipulated in the Common Market Organisation and specific accompanying legislation. Moreover, it is imperative to consider regulations regarding the use of health and nutrition claims, as well as labels such as ¿vegan¿ or ¿organic¿, etc. Furthermore, the labelling of novel foods and genetically modified foods may necessitate mandatory information specified in the authorisation process. The book serves as a comprehensive guideline for food business operators involved in the production of precision-fermented dairy alternatives, aiding them in navigating the intricate European regulatory landscape.

Die Globalisierung und die damit einhergehende Vernetzung der Märkte führt zu einem steigenden Wettbewerbsdruck für Unternehmen. Mit diesem Globalisierungseffekt geht ein Anstieg des juristischen Regelungsbedarfs einher, so dass die Unternehmen vor der Herausforderung stehen, die rechtlichen Blickwinkel sowohl in ihren strategischen als auch in ihren operativen Entscheidungen mit einzubeziehen. Gerade kleine und mittelständische Unternehmen haben strukturell bedingt meist keine eigene Rechtsabteilung oder juristisches Fachpersonal, auf die sie bei der Bearbeitung solcher Themen zurückgreifen können. Somit stehen Sie vor der Wahl, sich stetig rechtlich beraten zu lassen oder tragen das Risiko von Fehlern und möglichen Bußgeldern, was zu einer Verschlechterung der Wirtschaftlichkeit führen kann. Die Unternehmen übertragen damit den steigenden wirtschaftlichen Druck auch auf den juristischen Sektor, der seine Dienstleistungen immer schneller und kostengünstiger anbieten muss. Gerade der juristische Bereich ist durch die Ressource Mensch geprägt, deren Kapazitäten endlich sind. Dr. Cathleen Hesselbarth zeigt, dass Legal-Tech-Anwendungen eine sinnvolle Ergänzung darstellen können, um den Zwiespalt zwischen begrenzten Ressourcen und immer schneller benötigten Informationen zu verringern und schafft gleichzeitig eine fachübergreifende Verbindung zwischen Wirtschaft und Recht.

This book provides an in-depth discussion of the theoretical and practical issues of criminal imputation for negligence crime involving artificial intelligence. Accordingly, this study combines the imputation challenges brought about by AI with traditional criminal imputation theory and analyses imputation for negligence crime involving AI from three aspects: the basic principles, structure, and results of imputation for negligence crime involving AI. The traditional theory of imputation is discussed in detail. The readership is a group of people interested in this topic, including, in particular, interested laymen, undergraduate students and postgraduate researchers. The highlights of this book are it identifies the imputation challenges bought about by AI, reveals the theoretical and practical gap in the criminal imputation of negligent crimes involving AI, and provides an in-depth and creative ideas of criminal imputation for the negligent crimes involving AI.

This edited volume explores the principle of solidarity in international and EU law. Although the concept is regularly invoked in international and EU legal and policy debates alike, its meaning, nature and functions, as well as normative contours still remain nebulous.The contributions in this volume reflect on the legal trajectory of solidarity in international and EU law and offer unique insights into the evolution and status of the principle in different fields of international and EU law. By doing so, the book also serves as a springboard for answering broader questions pertaining to what the stage of development of this principle may imply for the two legal orders and their interaction.As the chapters of this book show, the debate on solidarity is premised on conflicting visions regarding the values underpinning the international legal order as well as the self-interest or community-oriented driving forces behind States' action at the international level. The regional (EU law) perspective offers a new lens through which to revisit classic questions pertaining to the nature of modern international law and to assess its continuing relevance in a world of regional organizations presenting different visions (and levels) of co-operation.This book, the second volume to appear in the Global Europe Series, will appeal to international and EU law researchers and policy-makers alike with an interest in the nature and function of the principle of solidarity in international and EU law.Eva Kassoti is Senior researcher in EU and International Law at the T.M.C. Asser Institute in The Hague, The Netherlands and the Academic Co-ordinator of CLEER.Narin Idriz is Researcher in EU Law at the T.M.C. Asser Institute in The Hague, The Netherlands.

Questo libro esamina le complesse sfide che il diritto internazionale umanitario deve affrontare di fronte alle guerre moderne. Analizza come i principi storici delle Convenzioni di Ginevra, dei loro Protocolli aggiuntivi e di altri trattati siano messi in discussione dalle dinamiche in continua evoluzione dei conflitti in Siria, Gaza e Ucraina. La guerra asimmetrica, la guerra cibernetica, l'urbanizzazione della guerra, la privatizzazione della guerra, la guerra ambientale, la guerra ibrida e la guerra tra alleanze sono solo alcuni dei fenomeni moderni con cui le antiche convenzioni devono oggi confrontarsi. Dalle strade di Aleppo e dalle macerie di Gaza ai territori contesi dell'Ucraina, questo libro offre una visione indispensabile dell'impatto reale della guerra del XXI secolo sulle popolazioni civili. Attraverso un attento esame di questi conflitti, l'autore mette in luce le lacune e le inadeguatezze delle normative attuali e propone le riforme necessarie per adattarsi alla guerra moderna.Questo libro è destinato a chiunque sia interessato al diritto internazionale, ai diritti umani e all'evoluzione del diritto internazionale umanitario. Offre non solo un'analisi dettagliata dei conflitti attuali, ma anche una visione visionaria del futuro del diritto internazionale in un mondo sempre più complesso e interconnesso.

Denne boken tar for seg de komplekse utfordringene den humanitære folkeretten står overfor i moderne kriger. Den analyserer hvordan de historiske prinsippene i Genèvekonvensjonene, deres tilleggsprotokoller og andre traktater utfordres av den stadig skiftende dynamikken i konfliktene i Syria, Gaza og Ukraina. Asymmetrisk krigføring, cyberkrigføring, urbanisering av krigføring, privatisering av krigføring, miljøkrigføring, hybridkrigføring og alliansekrigføring er bare noen av de moderne fenomenene som de tradisjonsrike konvensjonene må forholde seg til i dag. Fra gatene i Aleppo og ruinene i Gaza til de omstridte områdene i Ukraina gir denne boken et uunnværlig innblikk i hvordan det 21. århundrets krigføring påvirker sivilbefolkningen. Gjennom en grundig gjennomgang av disse konfliktene setter forfatteren et kritisk søkelys på hullene og manglene i dagens regelverk og foreslår nødvendige reformer for å tilpasse det til moderne krigføring. Denne boken henvender seg til alle som er interessert i folkerett, menneskerettigheter og utviklingen av internasjonal humanitær rett. Den gir ikke bare en detaljert analyse av aktuelle konflikter, men også et visjonært syn på folkerettens fremtid i en stadig mer kompleks og sammenkoblet verden.